Some points on your last blog:
“The possible loss of the Fry Tank by falling over the cliff” can’t we just build a wall? (Oops sarcasm)
“Because he’s seemed to interpret the law in whatever way benefits him the most”. When Jay wrote those blogs (in which he put his name on) asking us to follow the money trail it seems you blasted him. Now you are accusing him of gaining something by not having the water project done. What benefit does Jay get?
When you say that they have the votes to do it I assume you mean the board. Of course they do anyone who has been paying attention know the board is split 3 to 2. Is
Speaking of the split is it true that one member of the community collected over 20 proxies by attacking the actions of Jay Jump in a letter he sent to parts of the community. To me it sounds as if that the person is the one who has something to gain.
Political will and political capital are two different things. They may have the will but not the capital. If dues go up and dust is still an issue this board will have trouble.
If they cant handle the “unwarranted crap” resign, if not deal with it.
Now if you want questions Jay’s blog answer these questions I was not at the meeting last week so I do not know:
“George had to concede that the cost did not include labor”
Did George want to liquidate all the reserves?
My understanding is the county has no plans to give us 500GPM fire truck. Please tell me who you talked to because I heard from one person that the FD Commissioner Reinbold himself said that was not going to be the case. If there is a commitment from the County lets get it in writing.
My insurance agent says that regardless of the size of the truck my rates will not change due to the staffing of the FD.
If we are doing this project in the name of public safety wouldn’t you think an
Please answer these questions.
Sean
1 comment:
Sean,
I get the feeling the you want what is best for the community. However, I think sometimes the people (or person) who makes the most noise (or blogs)is the one who gets listened to the most. It's obvious that MOST people to do not want to blog. An extremely small percentage have blogged so far. That should tell you something.
Anyway, concerning the water project. Have you researched the history of the project? I truly think you would get a different story than you are getting on this blog. The vision of the project was for the good of the community and to comply with upcoming State mandates for water systems. The average person doesn't really care about those things, but it is the responsibilty of the board of directors to look ahead and have some vision for a good water system that meets the standards the State requires.
I get that you aren't happy about the roads. No one is happy about the dust, etc. but some of us understand that it should have been it's own project, one that was budgeted for and completed ONLY as there was money in the budget to do so and not at the expense of another project that had been planned for and budgeted for to be completed in phases.
Most of the information you read on this blog is slanted by the blogger and very inadequate for forming an educated opinion based on facts and not on what another person says. That is why I encourage you to seek out more of the facts concerning the water system.
Post a Comment